Nowadays, technology developments are causing environmental problems. Many people think that we should live a simpler life while others believe that technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Answer:
Technology has trespassed in almost all spheres of life. It has become an integral part of the human life. However, technology is also blamed to be the prime cause of environmental disturbances too. There has been split opinion regarding its use in context with environment. While some believe that we should live a simpler life, others vote that technology can be applied as a solution rather than taking it as a problem. Both the views are explained in detail further.
Focusing on the former view, it can be argued that avoiding technology or making judicial use can attribute to bring down the level of pollution and thus easing the problem of global warming. It will not only be less expensive but also help in saving the indigenous resources, also can curb the issues of deforestation and advancing deserts. Many animal and plant species would be saved. There would be less contamination in air, water and land. Evidently, this way of life could lead to restore the sudden climatic changes to its regular cycle.
In contrast, the latter view suggests technology as application rather than an issue. To begin with, the majority of the innovations can be conveniently used to actually save the surroundings. For instance, it is not unusual that technology is employed for building check dams that not only saves the nearby areas from flooding but also extends the irrigation facility. Moreover, technology has widely contributed to increase in productivity by applying the principals. The best examples for this are the drip irrigation method, genetic modification and hybrid produce. Thus, technology can put forwared ideas that are environmental friendly.
In my opinion, I undoubtedly support the latter view than the former one. This is because technology can definitely work more efficiently and bring more accurate results. Simple life is not an ideal solution because technology has more benefits to both man and his surroundings. The evidences mentioned prove that technology can contribute in a magnimous way to save environment.
Hence, in the light of above discussion it can be concluded that the technology developments can definitely help to resolve the environment problems by its thoughtful implications. I believe , technology is the answer to this problem than the question.
Answer:
Technology has trespassed in almost all spheres of life. It has become an integral part of the human life. However, technology is also blamed to be the prime cause of environmental disturbances too. There has been split opinion regarding its use in context with environment. While some believe that we should live a simpler life, others vote that technology can be applied as a solution rather than taking it as a problem. Both the views are explained in detail further.
Focusing on the former view, it can be argued that avoiding technology or making judicial use can attribute to bring down the level of pollution and thus easing the problem of global warming. It will not only be less expensive but also help in saving the indigenous resources, also can curb the issues of deforestation and advancing deserts. Many animal and plant species would be saved. There would be less contamination in air, water and land. Evidently, this way of life could lead to restore the sudden climatic changes to its regular cycle.
In contrast, the latter view suggests technology as application rather than an issue. To begin with, the majority of the innovations can be conveniently used to actually save the surroundings. For instance, it is not unusual that technology is employed for building check dams that not only saves the nearby areas from flooding but also extends the irrigation facility. Moreover, technology has widely contributed to increase in productivity by applying the principals. The best examples for this are the drip irrigation method, genetic modification and hybrid produce. Thus, technology can put forwared ideas that are environmental friendly.
In my opinion, I undoubtedly support the latter view than the former one. This is because technology can definitely work more efficiently and bring more accurate results. Simple life is not an ideal solution because technology has more benefits to both man and his surroundings. The evidences mentioned prove that technology can contribute in a magnimous way to save environment.
Hence, in the light of above discussion it can be concluded that the technology developments can definitely help to resolve the environment problems by its thoughtful implications. I believe , technology is the answer to this problem than the question.
